Temple City Bankruptcy Attorney

TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY
CHAPTER 11 - REORGANIZATION
    SUBCHAPTER IV - RAILROAD REORGANIZATION

-HEAD-
    Sec. 1172. Contents of plan

-STATUTE-
      (a) In addition to the provisions required or permitted under
    section 1123 of this title, a plan - 
        (1) shall specify the extent to and the means by which the
      debtor's rail service is proposed to be continued, and the extent
      to which any of the debtor's rail service is proposed to be
      terminated; and
        (2) may include a provision for - 
          (A) the transfer of any or all of the operating railroad
        lines of the debtor to another operating railroad; or
          (B) abandonment of any railroad line in accordance with
        section 1170 of this title.

      (b) If, except for the pendency of the case under this chapter,
    transfer of, or operation of or over, any of the debtor's rail
    lines by an entity other than the debtor or a successor to the
    debtor under the plan would require approval by the Board under a
    law of the United States, then a plan may not propose such a
    transfer or such operation unless the proponent of the plan
    initiates an appropriate application for such a transfer or such
    operation with the Board and, within such time as the court may
    fix, not exceeding 180 days, the Board, with or without a hearing,
    as the Board may determine, and with or without modification or
    condition, approves such application, or does not act on such
    application. Any action or order of the Board approving, modifying,
    conditioning, or disapproving such application is subject to review
    by the court only under sections 706(2)(A), 706(2)(B), 706(2)(C),
    and 706(2)(D) of title 5.
      (c)(1) In approving an application under subsection (b) of this
    section, the Board shall require the rail carrier to provide a fair
    arrangement at least as protective of the interests of employees as
    that established under section 11326(a) of title 49.
      (2) Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to affect the
    priorities or timing of payment of employee protection which might
    have existed in the absence of this subsection.

-SOURCE-
    (Pub. L. 95-598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2644; Pub. L. 96-448, title
    II, Sec. 227(b), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1931; Pub. L. 104-88,
    title III, Sec. 302(2), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 943; Pub. L. 109-
    8, title XII, Sec. 1218, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 195.)


                       HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES                   

                          LEGISLATIVE STATEMENTS                      
      Section 1172 of the House amendment is derived from section 1171
    of the House bill in preference to section 1170 of the Senate
    amendment with the exception that section 1170(4) of the Senate
    amendment is incorporated into section 1172(a)(1) of the House
    amendment.
      Section 1172(b) of the House amendment is derived from section
    1171(c) of the Senate amendment. The section gives the Interstate
    Commerce Commission the exclusive power to approve or disapprove
    the transfer of, or operation of or over, any of the debtor's rail
    lines over which the Commission has jurisdiction, subject to review
    under the Administrative Procedures Act [5 U.S.C. 551 et seq. and
    701 et seq.]. The section does not apply to a transfer of railroad
    lines to a successor of the debtor under a plan of reorganization
    by merger or otherwise.
      The House amendment deletes section 1171(a) of the Senate
    amendment as a matter to be determined by the Rules of Bankruptcy
    Procedure. It is anticipated that the rules will specify the period
    of time, such as 18 months, within which a trustee must file with
    the court a proposed plan of reorganization for the debtor or a
    report why a plan cannot be formulated. Incorporation by reference
    of section 1121 in section 1161 of title 11 means that a party in
    interest will also have a right to file a plan of reorganization.
    This differs from the position taken in the Senate amendment which
    would have permitted the Interstate Commerce Commission to file a
    plan of reorganization.

                         SENATE REPORT NO. 95-989                     
      Section 1170 adds to the general provisions required or permitted
    in reorganization plans by section 1123. Subsection (1) requires
    that a reorganization plan under the railroad subchapter specify
    the means by which the value of the claims of creditors and the
    interests of equity holders which are materially and adversely
    affected by the plan are to be realized. Subsection (2) permits a
    plan to include provisions for the issuance of warrants. Subsection
    (3) requires that the plan provide for fixed charges by probable
    earnings for their payment. Subsection (4) requires that the plan
    specify the means by which, and the extent to which, the debtor's
    rail service is to be continued, and shall identify any rail
    service to be terminated. Subsection (5) permits other appropriate
    provisions not inconsistent with the chapter. With the exception of
    subsection (4), the requirements are comparable to those of present
    section 77(b) [section 205(b) of former title 11]; subsection (4)
    emphasizes the public interest in the preservation of rail
    transportation.
      Section 1171 imposes on the court, rather than the Interstate
    Commerce Commission, as in present section 77 [section 205 of
    former title 11], the responsibility for the plan of
    reorganization. The Commission is empowered to make final decisions
    subject only to review by the court under the standards of the
    Administrative Procedure Act [5 U.S.C. 551 et seq. and 701 et seq.]
    as to any part of the plan which deals with transportation matters,
    such as the grant of operating rights of or over, or transfer of,
    the debtor's rail lines to other carriers.
      Subsection (a) requires the trustee to file a plan of
    reorganization within 18 months after the petition is filed, and
    permits the court, for good cause shown, to extend such time limit.
    Subsection (b) permits a plan to be proposed by any interested
    person, and permits the trustee to revise his plan at any time
    before it is approved by the court.
      Subsections (c), (d) and (e) require the court, when a plan is
    submitted by the trustee or, if the court deems it worthy of
    consideration, a plan submitted is proposed by any other person
    proposes the transfer of, or operation of or over, any of the
    debtor's lines by other carriers, to refer to such provisions of
    the plan to the Interstate Commerce Commission. The Commission,
    within 240 days, and after a hearing if the Commission so
    determines, is to report to the court the effects of such
    provisions of the plan in the light of national transportation
    policy and sections 5(3)(f)(A), (B), and (D), (F)-(I) of the
    Interstate Commerce Act [49 U.S.C. 11350(b)(1), (2), (4), (6)-(9)].
    The report of the Commission is conclusive in all further hearings
    on the plan by the court, subject only to review pursuant to 5
    U.S.C. 706(2)(A)-(D).

                          HOUSE REPORT NO. 95-595                      
      [Section 1171 (enacted as section 1172)] A plan in a railroad
    reorganization case may include provisions in addition to those
    required and permitted under an ordinary reorganization plan. It
    may provide for the transfer of any or all of the operating
    railroad lines of the debtor to another operating railroad.
      Paragraph (1) contemplates a liquidating plan for the debtor's
    rail lines, much as occurred in the Penn Central case by transfer
    of operating lines to ConRail. Such a liquidating plan is not per
    se contrary to the public interest, and the court will have to
    determine on a case-by-case basis, with the guidance of the
    Interstate Commerce Commission and of other parties in interest,
    whether the particular plan proposed is in the public interest, as
    required under proposed 11 U.S.C. 1172(3).
      The plan may also provide for abandonment in accordance with
    section 1169, governing abandonment generally. Neither of these
    provisions in a plan, transfer or abandonment of lines, requires
    ICC approval. Confirmation of the plan by the court authorizes the
    debtor to comply with the plan in accordance with section 1142(a)
    notwithstanding any bankruptcy law to the contrary.

                                AMENDMENTS                            
      2005 - Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 109-8 substituted "section
    11326(a)" for "section 11347".
      1995 - Subsecs. (b), (c)(1). Pub. L. 104-88 substituted "Board"
    for "Commission" wherever appearing.
      1980 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96-448 added subsec. (c).

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2005 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by Pub. L. 109-8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20,
    2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this
    title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see
    section 1501 of Pub. L. 109-8, set out as a note under section 101
    of this title.

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1995 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by Pub. L. 104-88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2
    of Pub. L. 104-88, set out as an Effective Date note under section
    701 of Title 49, Transportation.

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by Pub. L. 96-448 effective Oct. 1, 1980, see section
    710(a) of Pub. L. 96-448, set out as a note under section 1170 of
    this title.

                       NONAPPLICATION OF SUBSEC. (C)                   
      For provision that subsec. (c) of this section does not apply to
    Amtrak and its employees, see section 142(d) of Pub. L. 105-134,
    set out in an Employee Protection Reforms note under section 24706
    of Title 49, Transportation.

-End-